![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Please do not see The Last Airbender.
I first posted about my unhappiness with The Last Airbender film back in February, and at that point I thought that would be the end of it. I would simply ignore the movie and go about my life. But as the release date has gotten closer, I've gotten more and more upset, to the point where I am literally sick to my stomach about this film.
Please do me one favor first-- please go and read![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
ssj10's excellent and heartfelt post on this subject. I'll wait.
And now, here is what I have to say.
1. Avatar: The Last Airbender, the original series upon which the movie is based, was explicitly and deliberately created as a story set in “an ancient, fantastical Asian environment, primarily Chinese,” specifically as a response to all the European-based fantasy stories out there (think Lord of the Rings, etc). The creators have said "...we wanted to create a mythology that was based on Eastern culture, rather than Western culture." The cultures of Avatar were all based on real-world Asian and Inuit cultures, including the food, the clothing, the tools, the martial arts, even accurate Chinese calligraphy. All of the characters were Asian/Inuit-- people of color. To quotessj10, who says it so much more beautifully than I:
Then, before filming began, the actor playing Zuko, the primary villain in the first film, dropped out due to "scheduling conflicts." He was replaced with Dev Patel, who is ethnically Indian. After that, the rest of the villains in the film (all, like Zuko, part of the Fire Nation) were all cast, in the director's own words, "from Indian/Persian to Mediterranean, all that group with all its darker colors including Italians." So the villains are all darker-skinned actors, while the three main heroes are white.
3. This is Hollywood whitewashing, the Hollywood glass ceiling, at its absolute worst. There was no reason, none at all, to whitewash the three main heroes. In fact, this was the perfect opportunity to cast a whole rainbow of young, talented actors. It's right there in the source material. 82% of lead roles in Hollywood go to white actors. Less than 2% of lead roles go to Asian actors and less than 1% go to Native American actors. This film had every reason to be the antithesis of all that. Instead, it's business as usual, which I find deplorable.
I love Avatar: The Last Airbender. I wanted so very badly to love its big-screen adaptation. It breaks my heart that I don't. But I cannot and will not financially support a movie that condones these practices. I'm going to see The Karate Kid instead. I'd love it if you joined me.
Please do me one favor first-- please go and read
ssj10's excellent and heartfelt post on this subject. I'll wait.And now, here is what I have to say.
1. Avatar: The Last Airbender, the original series upon which the movie is based, was explicitly and deliberately created as a story set in “an ancient, fantastical Asian environment, primarily Chinese,” specifically as a response to all the European-based fantasy stories out there (think Lord of the Rings, etc). The creators have said "...we wanted to create a mythology that was based on Eastern culture, rather than Western culture." The cultures of Avatar were all based on real-world Asian and Inuit cultures, including the food, the clothing, the tools, the martial arts, even accurate Chinese calligraphy. All of the characters were Asian/Inuit-- people of color. To quote
ssj10, who says it so much more beautifully than I:"Here was a fantastical Asian world, full of well developed and delineated countries, each with a distinctive culture and a carefully developed mythology born from real world Asian traditions, art forms, myths and religions. Here was beautiful Hànzì adorning the walls of temples and restaurants. Here was the food I loved best from my childhood, eaten with chopsticks by the heroes of the show.2. When the filmmakers began to cast the movie, they deliberately set out to cast Caucasian actors in the four principal roles of Aang, Katara, Sokka, and Zuko. All of the casting notices read "Caucasian or any other ethnicity"-- not "all ethnicities" or "Asian ethnicities." They specifically wanted to cast the four leads with white actors. And they did so.
"And here were the Heroes: Brave, noble, beautiful, strong, and Asian."
Then, before filming began, the actor playing Zuko, the primary villain in the first film, dropped out due to "scheduling conflicts." He was replaced with Dev Patel, who is ethnically Indian. After that, the rest of the villains in the film (all, like Zuko, part of the Fire Nation) were all cast, in the director's own words, "from Indian/Persian to Mediterranean, all that group with all its darker colors including Italians." So the villains are all darker-skinned actors, while the three main heroes are white.
3. This is Hollywood whitewashing, the Hollywood glass ceiling, at its absolute worst. There was no reason, none at all, to whitewash the three main heroes. In fact, this was the perfect opportunity to cast a whole rainbow of young, talented actors. It's right there in the source material. 82% of lead roles in Hollywood go to white actors. Less than 2% of lead roles go to Asian actors and less than 1% go to Native American actors. This film had every reason to be the antithesis of all that. Instead, it's business as usual, which I find deplorable.
I love Avatar: The Last Airbender. I wanted so very badly to love its big-screen adaptation. It breaks my heart that I don't. But I cannot and will not financially support a movie that condones these practices. I'm going to see The Karate Kid instead. I'd love it if you joined me.
no subject
All joking aside, that's really awful and makes me angry. I mean, there are lots of beautiful mixed-race and race-indeterminate children that you could cast if they were afraid of being typecast as an "Asian movie" that no one in middle America would want to see. There are degrees of how hard a studio can suck. They just happened to pick the worst possible one.
no subject
Yeah, it's really bad. There were so many different ways they could've cast this movie, even if they didn't want to use the exact ethnicities already given in the series-- and they picked the absolute worst option.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've been thinking of posting on the topic too - 'Prince of Persia' made me really angry as well. I know it sounds trivial, but I'm always looking for brown roles to costume Dr Smith as... and they are few and far between in this culture. But then, the fact that is so difficult to find good costumes (especially of heroes) for him points to the heart of the problem. It's not trivial at all.
no subject
That's such a good point, about how hard it is to find good non-villainous costumes for
no subject
However I recently started watching the cartoon on Netflix Watch Instantly and have found it's pretty awesome.
I still have no plans to go see the movie, the casting and it's wtf-ery to blame. Maybe (probably not) I'll illegally download it at some point...but I won't give my money to support it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject